North Macedonia vs Paraguay: Democracy Index
North Macedonia
9
in 2018
Paraguay
9
in 2018
North Macedonia rank
33rd
Paraguay rank
33rd
Democracy Index over time
- North Macedonia
- Paraguay
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 9 against 9 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 98 shared years of data; in 1921 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 33rd and Paraguay ranks 33rd of 168 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 8 and Paraguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | -1.11 | -3 | 1.89 | North Macedonia |
| 1930s | -7.3 | -1.9 | 5.4 | Paraguay |
| 1940s | -3.7 | -7.8 | 4.1 | North Macedonia |
| 1950s | -7 | -7.4 | 0.4 | North Macedonia |
| 1960s | -7 | -8.7 | 1.7 | North Macedonia |
| 1970s | -7 | -8 | 1 | North Macedonia |
| 1980s | -5 | -7 | 2 | North Macedonia |
| 1990s | 4.9 | 5.9 | 1 | Paraguay |
| 2000s | 8.4 | 7.7 | 0.7 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 9 | 8.67 | 0.3333 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher democracy index, North Macedonia or Paraguay?
- North Macedonia, at 9 against 9 in Paraguay as of 2018.
- What is the difference in democracy index between North Macedonia and Paraguay?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Paraguay?
- 98 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
- How do North Macedonia and Paraguay rank globally for democracy index?
- North Macedonia ranks 33rd and Paraguay ranks 33rd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from -10 to 10 (fully democratic).