Japan vs Sweden: Democracy Index

Japan
10
in 2018
Sweden
10
in 2018
Japan rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st

Democracy Index over time

  • Japan
  • Sweden
-10-50510180019092018

How they compare

Japan currently reports 10 against 10 in Sweden, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 212 shared years of data; in 1800 it was Sweden ahead.

Japan ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 22 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 5 and Sweden in 10.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Sweden Difference Ahead
1800s -10 -9.9 0.1 Sweden
1810s -10 -8.2 1.8 Sweden
1820s -10 -8 2 Sweden
1830s -10 -8 2 Sweden
1840s -10 -7.2 2.8 Sweden
1850s -9.7 -6 3.7 Sweden
1860s -2.6 -5 2.4 Japan
1870s 1 -4 5 Japan
1880s 1 -4 5 Japan
1890s 1 -4 5 Japan
1900s 1 -3.3 4.3 Japan
1910s 1 6.5 5.5 Sweden
1920s 1 10 9 Sweden
1930s 1 10 9 Sweden
1940s 1 10 9 Sweden
1950s 10 10 0
1960s 10 10 0
1970s 10 10 0
1980s 10 10 0
1990s 10 10 0
2000s 10 10 0
2010s 10 10 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy index, Japan or Sweden?
Japan, at 10 against 10 in Sweden as of 2018.
What is the difference in democracy index between Japan and Sweden?
0, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Sweden?
212 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2018.
How do Japan and Sweden rank globally for democracy index?
Japan ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,392 data points, 1776–2020
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from -10 to 10 (fully democratic).