Guatemala vs Philippines: Democracy Index

Guatemala
8
in 2018
Philippines
8
in 2018
Guatemala rank
52nd
Philippines rank
52nd

Democracy Index over time

  • Guatemala
  • Philippines
-10-50510183919282018

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 8 against 8 in Philippines, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 81 shared years of data; in 1935 it was Philippines ahead.

Guatemala ranks 52nd and Philippines ranks 52nd of 167 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Philippines Difference Ahead
1930s -9 5 14 Philippines
1940s 3 2.43 0.5714 Guatemala
1950s -2.6 5 7.6 Philippines
1960s -1.8 4.7 6.5 Philippines
1970s -1.8 -6.8 5 Guatemala
1980s -1.9 -1.7 0.2 Philippines
1990s 5 8 3 Philippines
2000s 8 8 0
2010s 8 8 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy index, Guatemala or Philippines?
Guatemala, at 8 against 8 in Philippines as of 2018.
What is the difference in democracy index between Guatemala and Philippines?
0, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Philippines?
81 years are reported by both, from 1935 to 2018.
How do Guatemala and Philippines rank globally for democracy index?
Guatemala ranks 52nd and Philippines ranks 52nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,392 data points, 1776–2020
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from -10 to 10 (fully democratic).