Equatorial Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Democracy Index

Equatorial Guinea
-6
in 2018
Kazakhstan
-6
in 2018
Equatorial Guinea rank
146th
Kazakhstan rank
146th

Democracy Index over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Kazakhstan
-10-7.5-5-2.502.5180019092018

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports -6 against -6 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 146th and Kazakhstan ranks 146th of 167 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1960s -2.5 -7 4.5 Equatorial Guinea
1970s -7 -7 0
1980s -7 -6.6 0.4 Kazakhstan
1990s -6 -4.2 1.8 Kazakhstan
2000s -6 -6 0
2010s -6 -6 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy index, Equatorial Guinea or Kazakhstan?
Equatorial Guinea, at -6 against -6 in Kazakhstan as of 2018.
What is the difference in democracy index between Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan?
0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan?
51 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2018.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan rank globally for democracy index?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 146th and Kazakhstan ranks 146th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,392 data points, 1776–2020
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from -10 to 10 (fully democratic).