Democratic Republic of Congo vs Jordan: Democracy Index
Democratic Republic of Congo
-3
in 2018
Jordan
-3
in 2018
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
131st
Jordan rank
131st
Democracy Index over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Jordan
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports -3 against -3 in Jordan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 131st and Jordan ranks 131st of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 5 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -5.4 | -9 | 3.6 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 1970s | -9 | -9.6 | 0.6 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 1980s | -9 | -8.9 | 0.1 | Jordan |
| 1990s | -1.6 | -2.4 | 0.8 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2000s | 2.8 | -2.3 | 5.1 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 2.33 | -3 | 5.33 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher democracy index, Democratic Republic of Congo or Jordan?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at -3 against -3 in Jordan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in democracy index between Democratic Republic of Congo and Jordan?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Jordan?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Jordan rank globally for democracy index?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 131st and Jordan ranks 131st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from -10 to 10 (fully democratic).