Chile vs Sweden: Democracy Index

Chile
10
in 2018
Sweden
10
in 2018
Chile rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st

Democracy Index over time

  • Chile
  • Sweden
-10-50510180019092018

How they compare

Chile currently reports 10 against 10 in Sweden, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 201 shared years of data; in 1818 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 21 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 10 and Sweden in 10.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Sweden Difference Ahead
1810s -5 -8 3 Chile
1820s -5 -8 3 Chile
1830s -5 -8 3 Chile
1840s -5 -7.2 2.2 Chile
1850s -0.5 -6 5.5 Chile
1860s 0 -5 5 Chile
1870s 1.8 -4 5.8 Chile
1880s 3.4 -4 7.4 Chile
1890s 3.2 -4 7.2 Chile
1900s 3 -3.3 6.3 Chile
1910s 3 6.5 3.5 Sweden
1920s 0.2 10 9.8 Sweden
1930s 0 10 10 Sweden
1940s 2 10 8 Sweden
1950s 2.6 10 7.4 Sweden
1960s 5.6 10 4.4 Sweden
1970s -3.1 10 13.1 Sweden
1980s -4.4 10 14.4 Sweden
1990s 8 10 2 Sweden
2000s 9.4 10 0.6 Sweden
2010s 10 10 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy index, Chile or Sweden?
Chile, at 10 against 10 in Sweden as of 2018.
What is the difference in democracy index between Chile and Sweden?
0, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sweden?
201 years are reported by both, from 1818 to 2018.
How do Chile and Sweden rank globally for democracy index?
Chile ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,392 data points, 1776–2020
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from -10 to 10 (fully democratic).