Chile vs Luxembourg: Democracy Index

Chile
10
in 2018
Luxembourg
10
in 2018
Chile rank
1st
Luxembourg rank
1st

Democracy Index over time

  • Chile
  • Luxembourg
-50510181819182018

How they compare

Chile currently reports 10 against 10 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 147 shared years of data; in 1867 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 16 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Luxembourg in 12.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Luxembourg Difference Ahead
1860s 0 -3 3 Chile
1870s 1.8 -3 4.8 Chile
1880s 3.4 2 1.4 Chile
1890s 3.2 7 3.8 Luxembourg
1900s 3 7 4 Luxembourg
1910s 3 7 4 Luxembourg
1920s 0.2 10 9.8 Luxembourg
1930s 0 10 10 Luxembourg
1940s 2 10 8 Luxembourg
1950s 2.6 10 7.4 Luxembourg
1960s 5.6 10 4.4 Luxembourg
1970s -3.1 10 13.1 Luxembourg
1980s -4.4 10 14.4 Luxembourg
1990s 8 10 2 Luxembourg
2000s 9.4 10 0.6 Luxembourg
2010s 10 10 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy index, Chile or Luxembourg?
Chile, at 10 against 10 in Luxembourg as of 2018.
What is the difference in democracy index between Chile and Luxembourg?
0, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Luxembourg?
147 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2018.
How do Chile and Luxembourg rank globally for democracy index?
Chile ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,392 data points, 1776–2020
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from -10 to 10 (fully democratic).