Rwanda vs Somalia: Deliberative Democracy Index

Rwanda
0.182
in 2025
Somalia
0.189
in 2025
Rwanda rank
123rd
Somalia rank
120th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Rwanda
  • Somalia
00.10.20.3190019622025

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 0.189 against 0.182 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.007.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Somalia ahead.

Rwanda ranks 123rd and Somalia ranks 120th of 175 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 6 and Somalia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Somalia Difference Ahead
1910s 0.004 0.005 0.001 Somalia
1920s 0.004 0.005 0.001 Somalia
1930s 0.004 0.005 0.001 Somalia
1940s 0.004 0.0142 0.0102 Somalia
1950s 0.0055 0.0501 0.0446 Somalia
1960s 0.1049 0.1323 0.0274 Somalia
1970s 0.0724 0.02 0.0524 Rwanda
1980s 0.0998 0.0223 0.0775 Rwanda
1990s 0.1462 0.0609 0.0853 Rwanda
2000s 0.1731 0.0919 0.0812 Rwanda
2010s 0.2019 0.1528 0.0491 Rwanda
2020s 0.1982 0.1872 0.011 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Rwanda or Somalia?
Somalia, at 0.189 against 0.182 in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Rwanda and Somalia?
0.007, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Somalia?
110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
How do Rwanda and Somalia rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Rwanda ranks 123rd and Somalia ranks 120th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.