India vs Jordan: Deliberative Democracy Index
India
0.259
in 2025
Jordan
0.268
in 2025
India rank
101st
Jordan rank
99th
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- India
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.268 against 0.259 in India, a difference of 0.009.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.
India ranks 101st and Jordan ranks 99th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, India averaged higher in 9 and Jordan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.0574 | 0.1118 | 0.0544 | Jordan |
| 1930s | 0.0685 | 0.123 | 0.0545 | Jordan |
| 1940s | 0.1308 | 0.1245 | 0.0063 | India |
| 1950s | 0.4927 | 0.1445 | 0.3482 | India |
| 1960s | 0.5438 | 0.1332 | 0.4106 | India |
| 1970s | 0.4812 | 0.1195 | 0.3617 | India |
| 1980s | 0.585 | 0.1199 | 0.4651 | India |
| 1990s | 0.662 | 0.1911 | 0.4709 | India |
| 2000s | 0.6578 | 0.2011 | 0.4567 | India |
| 2010s | 0.4696 | 0.2153 | 0.2543 | India |
| 2020s | 0.2722 | 0.2382 | 0.034 | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, India or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 0.268 against 0.259 in India as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between India and Jordan?
- 0.009, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Jordan?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do India and Jordan rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- India ranks 101st and Jordan ranks 99th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.