Fiji vs Peru: Deliberative Democracy Index
Fiji
0.406
in 2025
Peru
0.377
in 2025
Fiji rank
73rd
Peru rank
76th
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Fiji
- Peru
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 0.406 against 0.377 in Peru, a difference of 0.029.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Peru ahead.
Fiji ranks 73rd and Peru ranks 76th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 8 and Peru in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.0886 | 0.1223 | 0.0337 | Peru |
| 1910s | 0.096 | 0.0889 | 0.0071 | Fiji |
| 1920s | 0.0951 | 0.0631 | 0.032 | Fiji |
| 1930s | 0.093 | 0.0582 | 0.0348 | Fiji |
| 1940s | 0.0867 | 0.0768 | 0.0099 | Fiji |
| 1950s | 0.1533 | 0.091 | 0.0623 | Fiji |
| 1960s | 0.2134 | 0.1684 | 0.045 | Fiji |
| 1970s | 0.4352 | 0.061 | 0.3742 | Fiji |
| 1980s | 0.3403 | 0.4736 | 0.1333 | Peru |
| 1990s | 0.3239 | 0.2134 | 0.1105 | Fiji |
| 2000s | 0.2052 | 0.6326 | 0.4274 | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.2124 | 0.6335 | 0.4211 | Peru |
| 2020s | 0.3535 | 0.4632 | 0.1097 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Fiji or Peru?
- Fiji, at 0.406 against 0.377 in Peru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Fiji and Peru?
- 0.029, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Peru?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and Peru rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Fiji ranks 73rd and Peru ranks 76th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.