Fiji vs Nepal: Deliberative Democracy Index

Fiji
0.406
in 2025
Nepal
0.406
in 2025
Fiji rank
73rd
Nepal rank
73rd

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Fiji
  • Nepal
00.10.20.30.40.5190019622025

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 0.406 against 0.406 in Nepal, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Fiji ahead.

Fiji ranks 73rd and Nepal ranks 73rd of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 10 and Nepal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Nepal Difference Ahead
1900s 0.0886 0.003 0.0856 Fiji
1910s 0.096 0.003 0.093 Fiji
1920s 0.0951 0.003 0.0921 Fiji
1930s 0.093 0.003 0.09 Fiji
1940s 0.0867 0.003 0.0837 Fiji
1950s 0.1533 0.1339 0.0194 Fiji
1960s 0.2134 0.0754 0.138 Fiji
1970s 0.4352 0.057 0.3782 Fiji
1980s 0.3403 0.0702 0.2701 Fiji
1990s 0.3239 0.314 0.0099 Fiji
2000s 0.2052 0.256 0.0508 Nepal
2010s 0.2124 0.4057 0.1933 Nepal
2020s 0.3535 0.398 0.0445 Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Fiji or Nepal?
Fiji, at 0.406 against 0.406 in Nepal as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Fiji and Nepal?
0, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Nepal?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Fiji and Nepal rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Fiji ranks 73rd and Nepal ranks 73rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.