Fiji vs Nepal: Deliberative Democracy Index
Fiji
0.406
in 2025
Nepal
0.406
in 2025
Fiji rank
73rd
Nepal rank
73rd
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Fiji
- Nepal
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 0.406 against 0.406 in Nepal, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 73rd and Nepal ranks 73rd of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 10 and Nepal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.0886 | 0.003 | 0.0856 | Fiji |
| 1910s | 0.096 | 0.003 | 0.093 | Fiji |
| 1920s | 0.0951 | 0.003 | 0.0921 | Fiji |
| 1930s | 0.093 | 0.003 | 0.09 | Fiji |
| 1940s | 0.0867 | 0.003 | 0.0837 | Fiji |
| 1950s | 0.1533 | 0.1339 | 0.0194 | Fiji |
| 1960s | 0.2134 | 0.0754 | 0.138 | Fiji |
| 1970s | 0.4352 | 0.057 | 0.3782 | Fiji |
| 1980s | 0.3403 | 0.0702 | 0.2701 | Fiji |
| 1990s | 0.3239 | 0.314 | 0.0099 | Fiji |
| 2000s | 0.2052 | 0.256 | 0.0508 | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0.2124 | 0.4057 | 0.1933 | Nepal |
| 2020s | 0.3535 | 0.398 | 0.0445 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Fiji or Nepal?
- Fiji, at 0.406 against 0.406 in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Fiji and Nepal?
- 0, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Nepal?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and Nepal rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Fiji ranks 73rd and Nepal ranks 73rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.