Ecuador vs Peru: Deliberative Democracy Index

Ecuador
0.366
in 2025
Peru
0.377
in 2025
Ecuador rank
79th
Peru rank
76th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Ecuador
  • Peru
00.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.377 against 0.366 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.011.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Peru ahead.

Ecuador ranks 79th and Peru ranks 76th of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Peru in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Peru Difference Ahead
1900s 0.0911 0.1223 0.0312 Peru
1910s 0.0939 0.0889 0.005 Ecuador
1920s 0.0672 0.0631 0.0041 Ecuador
1930s 0.0677 0.0582 0.0095 Ecuador
1940s 0.0796 0.0768 0.0028 Ecuador
1950s 0.1368 0.091 0.0458 Ecuador
1960s 0.0788 0.1684 0.0896 Peru
1970s 0.0557 0.061 0.0053 Peru
1980s 0.3859 0.4736 0.0877 Peru
1990s 0.4395 0.2134 0.2261 Ecuador
2000s 0.432 0.6326 0.2006 Peru
2010s 0.3966 0.6335 0.2369 Peru
2020s 0.4042 0.4632 0.059 Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Ecuador or Peru?
Peru, at 0.377 against 0.366 in Ecuador as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Ecuador and Peru?
0.011, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Ecuador ranks 79th and Peru ranks 76th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.