India vs Poland: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum over time
- India
- Poland
How they compare
India currently reports 15,075 against 13,848 in Poland, a difference of 1,227.
That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Poland ahead.
India ranks 47th and Poland ranks 50th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, India averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,740 | 2,986 | 1,246 | Poland |
| 2010s | 6,986 | 2,962 | 4,023 | India |
| 2020s | 13,437 | 7,046 | 6,391 | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, India or Poland?
- India, at 15,075 against 13,848 in Poland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum between India and Poland?
- 1,227, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Poland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do India and Poland rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum?
- India ranks 47th and Poland ranks 50th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.