Public Sector Corruption Index in Tunisia
Tunisia: Public Sector Corruption Index was 0.542 in 2025. ▬ Flat
Public Sector Corruption Index in Tunisia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Tunisia recorded 0.542 for public sector corruption index in 2025.
That represents a change of up 86.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, public sector corruption index in Tunisia peaked at 0.807 in 1988 and was at its lowest, 0.286, in 2011.
That places Tunisia 83rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
Public Sector Corruption Index in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.595 | — |
| 1790 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.595 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.376 | -36.8% |
| 1871 | 0.376 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.376 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.376 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.376 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.376 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.376 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.376 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.576 | +53.2% |
| 1879 | 0.576 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.576 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.661 | +14.8% |
| 1882 | 0.674 | +2.0% |
| 1883 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.674 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.731 | +8.5% |
| 1927 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.707 | -3.3% |
| 1943 | 0.707 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.739 | +4.5% |
| 1945 | 0.739 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.739 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.701 | -5.1% |
| 1948 | 0.701 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.701 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.667 | -4.9% |
| 1951 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.741 | +11.1% |
| 1953 | 0.741 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.673 | -9.2% |
| 1955 | 0.673 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.673 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.673 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.383 | -43.1% |
| 1959 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.434 | +13.3% |
| 1971 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.54 | +24.4% |
| 1988 | 0.807 | +49.4% |
| 1989 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.807 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.286 | -64.6% |
| 2012 | 0.3 | +4.9% |
| 2013 | 0.347 | +15.7% |
| 2014 | 0.347 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.291 | -16.1% |
| 2016 | 0.361 | +24.1% |
| 2017 | 0.361 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.361 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.361 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.34 | -5.8% |
| 2021 | 0.384 | +12.9% |
| 2022 | 0.542 | +41.1% |
| 2023 | 0.542 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.542 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.542 | +0.0% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's 0.542 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.693, 78% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Tunisia's 0.542 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.595, 91% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.595 | 0.595 | 0.595 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.595 | 0.595 | 0.595 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.595 | 0.595 | 0.595 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.595 | 0.595 | 0.595 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.595 | 0.595 | 0.595 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.595 | 0.595 | 0.595 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.595 | 0.595 | 0.595 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.595 | 0.595 | 0.595 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.595 | 0.595 | 0.595 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.416 | 0.376 | 0.576 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.6629 | 0.576 | 0.674 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.674 | 0.674 | 0.674 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.674 | 0.674 | 0.674 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.674 | 0.674 | 0.674 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.6968 | 0.674 | 0.731 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.731 | 0.731 | 0.731 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.7196 | 0.701 | 0.739 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.6274 | 0.383 | 0.741 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.383 | 0.383 | 0.383 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.434 | 0.434 | 0.434 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.5192 | 0.434 | 0.807 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.807 | 0.807 | 0.807 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.807 | 0.807 | 0.807 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.3822 | 0.286 | 0.807 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.482 | 0.34 | 0.542 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
More social development data for Tunisia
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 2,386 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 3,711 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 6 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 0 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 6 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0003 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 3,711 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0002 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is public sector corruption index in Tunisia?
- Public sector corruption index in Tunisia was 0.542 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest public sector corruption index recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.807 in 1988.
- What is the lowest public sector corruption index recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.286 in 2011.
- How does Tunisia rank for public sector corruption index?
- Tunisia ranks 83rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is public sector corruption index rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 86.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Public Sector Corruption Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which public sector employees engage in bribery and theft. The index ranges from 0 to 1 (highly corrupt).