Statizoid

Press freedom in Mauritius

Mauritius: Press freedom was 2 in 2016. ▲ Rising

Latest (2016)
2
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 194 countries
All-time high
2
in 1979
All-time low
1
in 1986
Years of data
36
1979–2016

Press freedom in Mauritius, 1979–2016

00.511.521979199720161979: 21980: 21982: 21983: 21984: 21985: 21986: 11987: 11988: 21990: 21991: 21992: 21993: 21994: 21995: 21996: 21997: 21998: 21999: 22000: 22001: 22002: 22003: 22004: 22005: 22006: 22007: 22008: 22009: 22010: 22011: 22012: 22013: 22014: 22015: 22016: 2

Source: Freedom House (2017) – processed by Our World in Data.

Analysis

The most recent figure for press freedom in Mauritius is 2, measured in 2016. That is the highest value across all 36 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, press freedom in Mauritius peaked at 2 in 1979 and was at its lowest, 1, in 1986.

Mauritius ranks 1st of 194 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 36 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 2 2 2 1
1980s 1.75 1 2 8
1990s 2 2 2 10
2000s 2 2 2 10
2010s 2 2 2 7

Countries ranked near Mauritius

  1. 1 Andorra 2 compare
  2. 1 Australia 2 compare
  3. 1 Austria 2 compare
  4. 1 Bahamas 2 compare
  5. 1 Barbados 2 compare
  6. 1 Belgium 2 compare
  7. 1 Belize 2 compare
  8. 1 Canada 2 compare
  9. 1 Cape Verde 2 compare
  10. 1 Chile 2 compare
  11. 1 Costa Rica 2 compare
  12. 1 Cyprus 2 compare
  13. 1 Czechia 2 compare
  14. 1 Denmark 2 compare
  15. 1 Dominica 2 compare
  16. 1 Estonia 2 compare
  17. 1 Finland 2 compare
  18. 1 France 2 compare
  19. 1 Germany 2 compare
  20. 1 Grenada 2 compare
  21. 1 Iceland 2 compare
  22. 1 Jamaica 2 compare
  23. 1 Japan 2 compare
  24. 1 Kiribati 2 compare
  25. 1 Latvia 2 compare
  26. 1 Lithuania 2 compare
  27. 1 Marshall Islands 2 compare
  28. 1 Monaco 2 compare
  29. 1 Netherlands 2 compare
  30. 1 New Zealand 2 compare
  31. 1 Norway 2 compare
  32. 1 Palau 2 compare
  33. 1 Papua New Guinea 2 compare
  34. 1 Portugal 2 compare
  35. 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 2 compare
  36. 1 Saint Lucia 2 compare
  37. 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2 compare
  38. 1 Samoa 2 compare
  39. 1 San Marino 2 compare
  40. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 2 compare
  41. 1 Slovakia 2 compare
  42. 1 Slovenia 2 compare
  43. 1 Solomon Islands 2 compare
  44. 1 Spain 2 compare
  45. 1 Suriname 2 compare
  46. 1 Sweden 2 compare
  47. 1 Switzerland 2 compare
  48. 1 Taiwan 2 compare
  49. 1 Tonga 2 compare
  50. 1 Trinidad and Tobago 2 compare
  51. 1 Tuvalu 2 compare
  52. 1 United Kingdom 2 compare
  53. 1 United States 2 compare
  54. 1 Uruguay 2 compare
  55. 1 Vanuatu 2 compare

See the full ranking of 194 places →

More social development data for Mauritius

All data for Mauritius →

Frequently asked questions

What is press freedom in Mauritius?
Press freedom in Mauritius was 2 in 2016, according to Freedom House (2017) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest press freedom recorded in Mauritius?
The highest recorded value was 2 in 1979.
What is the lowest press freedom recorded in Mauritius?
The lowest recorded value was 1 in 1986.
How does Mauritius rank for press freedom?
Mauritius ranks 1st out of 194 countries with data for 2016.
Is press freedom rising or falling in Mauritius?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Mauritius data come from?
The figures come from Freedom House (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Press freedom. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Press freedom
Source
Freedom House (2017) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
194 places, 6,417 data points, 1979–2016
Last refreshed

Based on the classification and data by Freedom House. It captures the legal, political, and economic environment of the press.