Political Corruption Index in Tunisia
Tunisia: Political Corruption Index was 0.41 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Political Corruption Index in Tunisia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Tunisia recorded 0.41 for political corruption index in 2025.
The figure is up 27.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, political corruption index in Tunisia peaked at 0.872 in 1988 and was at its lowest, 0.322, in 2015.
That places Tunisia 102nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Political Corruption Index in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.714 | — |
| 1790 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.714 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.637 | -10.8% |
| 1858 | 0.637 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.584 | -8.3% |
| 1860 | 0.584 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.584 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.584 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.584 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.584 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.738 | +26.4% |
| 1866 | 0.738 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.738 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.738 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.738 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.669 | -9.3% |
| 1871 | 0.614 | -8.2% |
| 1872 | 0.614 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.614 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.614 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.614 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.614 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.614 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.73 | +18.9% |
| 1879 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.761 | +4.2% |
| 1882 | 0.746 | -2.0% |
| 1883 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.746 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.78 | +4.6% |
| 1927 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.771 | -1.2% |
| 1943 | 0.767 | -0.5% |
| 1944 | 0.778 | +1.4% |
| 1945 | 0.778 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.778 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.765 | -1.7% |
| 1948 | 0.765 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.765 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.755 | -1.3% |
| 1951 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.786 | +4.1% |
| 1953 | 0.786 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.755 | -3.9% |
| 1955 | 0.749 | -0.8% |
| 1956 | 0.617 | -17.6% |
| 1957 | 0.617 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.384 | -37.8% |
| 1959 | 0.384 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.474 | +23.4% |
| 1961 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.477 | +0.6% |
| 1970 | 0.491 | +2.9% |
| 1971 | 0.491 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.506 | +3.1% |
| 1973 | 0.506 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.506 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.506 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.506 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.506 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.506 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.506 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.525 | +3.8% |
| 1981 | 0.525 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.525 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.525 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.525 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.525 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.525 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.588 | +12.0% |
| 1988 | 0.872 | +48.3% |
| 1989 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.871 | -0.1% |
| 2009 | 0.872 | +0.1% |
| 2010 | 0.862 | -1.1% |
| 2011 | 0.335 | -61.1% |
| 2012 | 0.328 | -2.1% |
| 2013 | 0.346 | +5.5% |
| 2014 | 0.34 | -1.7% |
| 2015 | 0.322 | -5.3% |
| 2016 | 0.371 | +15.2% |
| 2017 | 0.383 | +3.2% |
| 2018 | 0.379 | -1.0% |
| 2019 | 0.379 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.375 | -1.1% |
| 2021 | 0.448 | +19.5% |
| 2022 | 0.417 | -6.9% |
| 2023 | 0.417 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.41 | -1.7% |
| 2025 | 0.41 | +0.0% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's 0.41 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.7175, 57% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Tunisia's 0.41 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.619, 66% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.714 | 0.714 | 0.714 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.714 | 0.714 | 0.714 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.714 | 0.714 | 0.714 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.714 | 0.714 | 0.714 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.714 | 0.714 | 0.714 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.714 | 0.714 | 0.714 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.714 | 0.714 | 0.714 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.6856 | 0.584 | 0.714 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.661 | 0.584 | 0.738 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.6427 | 0.614 | 0.73 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.7459 | 0.73 | 0.761 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.746 | 0.746 | 0.746 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.746 | 0.746 | 0.746 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.746 | 0.746 | 0.746 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.7596 | 0.746 | 0.78 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.7727 | 0.765 | 0.78 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.6588 | 0.384 | 0.786 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.4743 | 0.474 | 0.477 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.503 | 0.491 | 0.506 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6007 | 0.525 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.872 | 0.872 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.8719 | 0.871 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.4045 | 0.322 | 0.862 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.4128 | 0.375 | 0.448 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
More social development data for Tunisia
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 2,386 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 3,711 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 6 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 0 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 6 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0003 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 3,711 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0002 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political corruption index in Tunisia?
- Political corruption index in Tunisia was 0.41 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest political corruption index recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.872 in 1988.
- What is the lowest political corruption index recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.322 in 2015.
- How does Tunisia rank for political corruption index?
- Tunisia ranks 102nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is political corruption index rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 27.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Political Corruption Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which a country is affected by political corruption.