Physical Integrity Rights Index in Czechia
Czechia: Physical Integrity Rights Index was 0.985 in 2025. ▬ Flat
Latest (2025)
0.985
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
6th
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.986
in 2006
All-time low
0.04
in 1940
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Physical Integrity Rights Index in Czechia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Czechia recorded 0.985 for physical integrity rights index in 2025.
That represents a change of down 0.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, physical integrity rights index in Czechia peaked at 0.986 in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.04, in 1940.
That places Czechia 6th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
Physical Integrity Rights Index in Czechia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.743 | — |
| 1790 | 0.743 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.743 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.743 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.743 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.743 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.419 | -43.6% |
| 1796 | 0.742 | +77.1% |
| 1797 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.418 | -43.7% |
| 1849 | 0.418 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.693 | +65.8% |
| 1851 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.693 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.729 | +5.2% |
| 1868 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.729 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.799 | +9.6% |
| 1915 | 0.799 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.799 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.799 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.966 | +20.9% |
| 1919 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.944 | -2.3% |
| 1939 | 0.403 | -57.3% |
| 1940 | 0.04 | -90.1% |
| 1941 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.533 | +1232.5% |
| 1946 | 0.681 | +27.8% |
| 1947 | 0.681 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.27 | -60.4% |
| 1949 | 0.195 | -27.8% |
| 1950 | 0.195 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.195 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.195 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.195 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.246 | +26.2% |
| 1955 | 0.246 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.328 | +33.3% |
| 1957 | 0.328 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.328 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.328 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.37 | +12.8% |
| 1961 | 0.438 | +18.4% |
| 1962 | 0.438 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.463 | +5.7% |
| 1964 | 0.463 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.463 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.463 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.474 | +2.4% |
| 1968 | 0.563 | +18.8% |
| 1969 | 0.506 | -10.1% |
| 1970 | 0.493 | -2.6% |
| 1971 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.493 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.525 | +6.5% |
| 1990 | 0.979 | +86.5% |
| 1991 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.986 | +0.7% |
| 2007 | 0.986 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.986 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.986 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.986 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.986 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.986 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.986 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.986 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.986 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.975 | -1.1% |
| 2017 | 0.975 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.979 | +0.4% |
| 2019 | 0.979 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.985 | +0.6% |
| 2021 | 0.969 | -1.6% |
| 2022 | 0.985 | +1.7% |
| 2023 | 0.985 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.985 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.985 | +0.0% |
Czechia compared with similar countries
- Czechia's 0.985 is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.949, 1.0× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Czechia's 0.985 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.938, 1.1× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.743 | 0.743 | 0.743 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.7102 | 0.419 | 0.743 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.742 | 0.742 | 0.742 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.742 | 0.742 | 0.742 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.742 | 0.742 | 0.742 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.742 | 0.742 | 0.742 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.6772 | 0.418 | 0.742 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.693 | 0.693 | 0.693 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.7038 | 0.693 | 0.729 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.729 | 0.729 | 0.729 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.729 | 0.729 | 0.729 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.729 | 0.729 | 0.729 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.729 | 0.729 | 0.729 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.8044 | 0.729 | 0.966 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.966 | 0.966 | 0.966 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.9075 | 0.403 | 0.966 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.256 | 0.04 | 0.681 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.2584 | 0.195 | 0.328 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.4641 | 0.37 | 0.563 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.493 | 0.493 | 0.493 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.4962 | 0.493 | 0.525 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.979 | 0.979 | 0.979 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9818 | 0.979 | 0.986 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.9824 | 0.975 | 0.986 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9823 | 0.969 | 0.985 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Czechia
More social development data for Czechia
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 395,559 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 794 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 1 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 1 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0001 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 794 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0363 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is physical integrity rights index in Czechia?
- Physical integrity rights index in Czechia was 0.985 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest physical integrity rights index recorded in Czechia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.986 in 2006.
- What is the lowest physical integrity rights index recorded in Czechia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.04 in 1940.
- How does Czechia rank for physical integrity rights index?
- Czechia ranks 6th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is physical integrity rights index rising or falling in Czechia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Czechia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Physical Integrity Rights Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which people are free from government torture and political killings.