Key features of liberal democracy in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Key features of liberal democracy was 0.178 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Key features of liberal democracy in Kyrgyzstan, 1876–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for key features of liberal democracy in Kyrgyzstan is 0.178, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 3.8% on the previous year and down 43.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, key features of liberal democracy in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 0.333 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.014, in 1938.
That places Kyrgyzstan 111th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Key features of liberal democracy in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1876 | 0.096 | — |
| 1877 | 0.096 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.055 | -42.7% |
| 1879 | 0.055 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.055 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.039 | -29.1% |
| 1882 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.04 | +2.6% |
| 1886 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.046 | +15.0% |
| 1895 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.045 | -2.2% |
| 1898 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.038 | -15.6% |
| 1901 | 0.039 | +2.6% |
| 1902 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.038 | -2.6% |
| 1906 | 0.06 | +57.9% |
| 1907 | 0.063 | +5.0% |
| 1908 | 0.071 | +12.7% |
| 1909 | 0.073 | +2.8% |
| 1910 | 0.072 | -1.4% |
| 1911 | 0.074 | +2.8% |
| 1912 | 0.074 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.074 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.072 | -2.7% |
| 1915 | 0.07 | -2.8% |
| 1916 | 0.069 | -1.4% |
| 1917 | 0.063 | -8.7% |
| 1918 | 0.028 | -55.6% |
| 1919 | 0.022 | -21.4% |
| 1920 | 0.021 | -4.5% |
| 1921 | 0.021 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.021 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.021 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.018 | -14.3% |
| 1925 | 0.018 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.018 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.018 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.017 | -5.6% |
| 1929 | 0.017 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.017 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.017 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.017 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.016 | -5.9% |
| 1934 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.017 | +6.3% |
| 1938 | 0.014 | -17.6% |
| 1939 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.015 | +7.1% |
| 1947 | 0.015 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.015 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.015 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.015 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.015 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.015 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.015 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.021 | +40.0% |
| 1955 | 0.021 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.022 | +4.8% |
| 1957 | 0.024 | +9.1% |
| 1958 | 0.024 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.024 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.024 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.024 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.023 | -4.2% |
| 1963 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.024 | +4.3% |
| 1971 | 0.025 | +4.2% |
| 1972 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.024 | -4.0% |
| 1978 | 0.024 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.025 | +4.2% |
| 1980 | 0.028 | +12.0% |
| 1981 | 0.028 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.028 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.027 | -3.6% |
| 1984 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.029 | +7.4% |
| 1986 | 0.037 | +27.6% |
| 1987 | 0.041 | +10.8% |
| 1988 | 0.043 | +4.9% |
| 1989 | 0.064 | +48.8% |
| 1990 | 0.141 | +120.3% |
| 1991 | 0.17 | +20.6% |
| 1992 | 0.206 | +21.2% |
| 1993 | 0.204 | -1.0% |
| 1994 | 0.194 | -4.9% |
| 1995 | 0.182 | -6.2% |
| 1996 | 0.179 | -1.6% |
| 1997 | 0.172 | -3.9% |
| 1998 | 0.177 | +2.9% |
| 1999 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.174 | -1.7% |
| 2001 | 0.171 | -1.7% |
| 2002 | 0.17 | -0.6% |
| 2003 | 0.168 | -1.2% |
| 2004 | 0.168 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.19 | +13.1% |
| 2006 | 0.198 | +4.2% |
| 2007 | 0.181 | -8.6% |
| 2008 | 0.169 | -6.6% |
| 2009 | 0.165 | -2.4% |
| 2010 | 0.26 | +57.6% |
| 2011 | 0.333 | +28.1% |
| 2012 | 0.328 | -1.5% |
| 2013 | 0.316 | -3.7% |
| 2014 | 0.314 | -0.6% |
| 2015 | 0.317 | +1.0% |
| 2016 | 0.303 | -4.4% |
| 2017 | 0.303 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.327 | +7.9% |
| 2019 | 0.309 | -5.5% |
| 2020 | 0.255 | -17.5% |
| 2021 | 0.256 | +0.4% |
| 2022 | 0.237 | -7.4% |
| 2023 | 0.197 | -16.9% |
| 2024 | 0.185 | -6.1% |
| 2025 | 0.178 | -3.8% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 0.178 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.203, 88% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 0.178 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.591, 30% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Key features of liberal democracy in Kyrgyzstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | +120.3% | 0.064 | 0.141 |
| 1906 | +57.9% | 0.038 | 0.06 |
| 2010 | +57.6% | 0.165 | 0.26 |
| 1918 | -55.6% | 0.063 | 0.028 |
| 1989 | +48.8% | 0.043 | 0.064 |
| 1878 | -42.7% | 0.096 | 0.055 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 0.0755 | 0.055 | 0.096 | 4 |
| 1880s | 0.0411 | 0.039 | 0.055 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.0433 | 0.04 | 0.046 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.0499 | 0.038 | 0.073 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.0618 | 0.022 | 0.074 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.019 | 0.017 | 0.021 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.016 | 0.014 | 0.017 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.0144 | 0.014 | 0.015 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.0196 | 0.015 | 0.024 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.0232 | 0.023 | 0.024 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0247 | 0.024 | 0.025 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0352 | 0.027 | 0.064 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1802 | 0.141 | 0.206 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1754 | 0.165 | 0.198 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.311 | 0.26 | 0.333 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.218 | 0.178 | 0.256 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More social development data for Kyrgyzstan
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 1,150 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 3,337 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 7 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 0 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 7 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0005 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 3,337 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0002 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is key features of liberal democracy in Kyrgyzstan?
- Key features of liberal democracy in Kyrgyzstan was 0.178 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest key features of liberal democracy recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.333 in 2011.
- What is the lowest key features of liberal democracy recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.014 in 1938.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for key features of liberal democracy?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 111th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is key features of liberal democracy rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 43.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Key features of liberal democracy. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 150 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, individual and minority rights, equality before the law, and executive constraints.