Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Uruguay
Uruguay: Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate was 2.86 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
2.86 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 80.5%
World rank
36th
of 176 countries
All-time high
961.11 % change on previous year
in 1985
All-time low
-81.9 % change on previous year
in 1973
Years of data
200
1826–2025
Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Uruguay, 1826–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Uruguay is 2.86 % change on previous year, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 80.5% on the previous year and up 319.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Uruguay peaked at 961.11 % change on previous year in 1985 and was at its lowest, -81.9 % change on previous year, in 1973.
Uruguay ranks 36th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1826 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1827 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1828 | 1.56 % change on previous year | — |
| 1829 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1830 | 120 % change on previous year | — |
| 1831 | 11.89 % change on previous year | -90.1% |
| 1832 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1833 | 0.625 % change on previous year | — |
| 1834 | 4.97 % change on previous year | +695.0% |
| 1835 | 14.2 % change on previous year | +185.8% |
| 1836 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1837 | 2.59 % change on previous year | — |
| 1838 | -9.09 % change on previous year | -450.9% |
| 1839 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1840 | -2.22 % change on previous year | — |
| 1841 | -1.14 % change on previous year | -48.9% |
| 1842 | 2.87 % change on previous year | -352.9% |
| 1843 | -1.12 % change on previous year | -138.9% |
| 1844 | 1.13 % change on previous year | -201.1% |
| 1845 | -14.53 % change on previous year | -1385.5% |
| 1846 | -21.57 % change on previous year | +48.5% |
| 1847 | -14.17 % change on previous year | -34.3% |
| 1848 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1849 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1850 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1851 | 24.27 % change on previous year | — |
| 1852 | 87.5 % change on previous year | +260.5% |
| 1853 | -4.58 % change on previous year | -105.2% |
| 1854 | -0.4367 % change on previous year | -90.5% |
| 1855 | -18.86 % change on previous year | +4218.9% |
| 1856 | 21.08 % change on previous year | -211.8% |
| 1857 | 2.23 % change on previous year | -89.4% |
| 1858 | 0.4367 % change on previous year | -80.4% |
| 1859 | -0.8696 % change on previous year | -299.1% |
| 1860 | 24.56 % change on previous year | -2924.6% |
| 1861 | 6.69 % change on previous year | -72.8% |
| 1862 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1863 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1864 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1865 | -56.77 % change on previous year | — |
| 1866 | -1.53 % change on previous year | -97.3% |
| 1867 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1868 | 93.02 % change on previous year | — |
| 1869 | 2.41 % change on previous year | -97.4% |
| 1870 | 5.49 % change on previous year | +127.8% |
| 1871 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1872 | 3.35 % change on previous year | — |
| 1873 | 8.99 % change on previous year | +168.8% |
| 1874 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1875 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1876 | -53.8 % change on previous year | — |
| 1877 | -8.57 % change on previous year | -84.1% |
| 1878 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1879 | 11.72 % change on previous year | — |
| 1880 | 31.47 % change on previous year | +168.5% |
| 1881 | 2.13 % change on previous year | -93.2% |
| 1882 | 2.08 % change on previous year | -2.1% |
| 1883 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1884 | 9.69 % change on previous year | — |
| 1885 | 18.14 % change on previous year | +87.1% |
| 1886 | 1.57 % change on previous year | -91.3% |
| 1887 | 3.88 % change on previous year | +146.1% |
| 1888 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1889 | 1.49 % change on previous year | — |
| 1890 | -2.57 % change on previous year | -272.4% |
| 1891 | 2.64 % change on previous year | -202.6% |
| 1892 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1893 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1894 | 4.04 % change on previous year | — |
| 1895 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1896 | -6.36 % change on previous year | — |
| 1897 | -6.79 % change on previous year | +6.8% |
| 1898 | 10.93 % change on previous year | -260.9% |
| 1899 | 9.49 % change on previous year | -13.2% |
| 1900 | -1.67 % change on previous year | -117.6% |
| 1901 | -0.678 % change on previous year | -59.3% |
| 1902 | -4.78 % change on previous year | +604.8% |
| 1903 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1904 | -2.51 % change on previous year | — |
| 1905 | 3.68 % change on previous year | -246.5% |
| 1906 | 1.77 % change on previous year | -51.8% |
| 1907 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1908 | -2.09 % change on previous year | — |
| 1909 | 1.07 % change on previous year | -151.1% |
| 1910 | 1.06 % change on previous year | -1.1% |
| 1911 | 3.48 % change on previous year | +229.8% |
| 1912 | 1.68 % change on previous year | -51.7% |
| 1913 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1914 | -1.66 % change on previous year | — |
| 1915 | 1.35 % change on previous year | -181.3% |
| 1916 | 9.97 % change on previous year | +640.0% |
| 1917 | 11.18 % change on previous year | +12.2% |
| 1918 | 4.35 % change on previous year | -61.1% |
| 1919 | 8.59 % change on previous year | +97.7% |
| 1920 | -0.2398 % change on previous year | -102.8% |
| 1921 | -1.2 % change on previous year | +401.2% |
| 1922 | 0.7299 % change on previous year | -160.7% |
| 1923 | 3.38 % change on previous year | +363.3% |
| 1924 | 3.97 % change on previous year | +17.5% |
| 1925 | 3.15 % change on previous year | -20.8% |
| 1926 | 1.96 % change on previous year | -37.7% |
| 1927 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1928 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1929 | -0.4274 % change on previous year | — |
| 1930 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1931 | -0.8584 % change on previous year | — |
| 1932 | -1.3 % change on previous year | +51.3% |
| 1933 | -48.9 % change on previous year | +3665.6% |
| 1934 | 9.01 % change on previous year | -118.4% |
| 1935 | 20.87 % change on previous year | +131.5% |
| 1936 | 5.21 % change on previous year | -75.0% |
| 1937 | 0.9288 % change on previous year | -82.2% |
| 1938 | 2.15 % change on previous year | +131.2% |
| 1939 | 26.13 % change on previous year | +1116.7% |
| 1940 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1941 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1942 | 8.57 % change on previous year | — |
| 1943 | 30.92 % change on previous year | +260.7% |
| 1944 | 0.1675 % change on previous year | -99.5% |
| 1945 | 0.8361 % change on previous year | +399.2% |
| 1946 | 4.64 % change on previous year | +455.4% |
| 1947 | 2.85 % change on previous year | -38.6% |
| 1948 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1949 | 0.9245 % change on previous year | — |
| 1950 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1951 | 0.3053 % change on previous year | — |
| 1952 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1953 | 0.6088 % change on previous year | — |
| 1954 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1955 | 0.1513 % change on previous year | — |
| 1956 | 1.06 % change on previous year | +598.9% |
| 1957 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1958 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1959 | -0.5979 % change on previous year | — |
| 1960 | -0.1504 % change on previous year | -74.8% |
| 1961 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1962 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | -2.26 % change on previous year | — |
| 1964 | -0.9245 % change on previous year | -59.1% |
| 1965 | -0.311 % change on previous year | -66.4% |
| 1966 | 0.78 % change on previous year | -350.8% |
| 1967 | -2.48 % change on previous year | -417.5% |
| 1968 | -21.9 % change on previous year | +784.4% |
| 1969 | -1.83 % change on previous year | -91.6% |
| 1970 | -8.9 % change on previous year | +386.7% |
| 1971 | -6.59 % change on previous year | -26.0% |
| 1972 | -18 % change on previous year | +173.2% |
| 1973 | -81.9 % change on previous year | +354.9% |
| 1974 | -27.87 % change on previous year | -66.0% |
| 1975 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1976 | -2.27 % change on previous year | — |
| 1977 | -2.33 % change on previous year | +2.3% |
| 1978 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1979 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1980 | 7.14 % change on previous year | — |
| 1981 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1982 | 2.22 % change on previous year | — |
| 1983 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1984 | 17.39 % change on previous year | — |
| 1985 | 961.11 % change on previous year | +5426.4% |
| 1986 | 22.16 % change on previous year | -97.7% |
| 1987 | 3.71 % change on previous year | -83.2% |
| 1988 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1989 | 0.1377 % change on previous year | — |
| 1990 | 4.54 % change on previous year | +3195.5% |
| 1991 | 0.2632 % change on previous year | -94.2% |
| 1992 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1993 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1994 | -0.1312 % change on previous year | — |
| 1995 | 4.34 % change on previous year | -3404.3% |
| 1996 | 0.2519 % change on previous year | -94.2% |
| 1997 | -0.1256 % change on previous year | -149.9% |
| 1998 | 1.13 % change on previous year | -1001.1% |
| 1999 | -0.2488 % change on previous year | -122.0% |
| 2000 | -0.6234 % change on previous year | +150.6% |
| 2001 | 0.6274 % change on previous year | -200.6% |
| 2002 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2003 | -1.5 % change on previous year | — |
| 2004 | 2.28 % change on previous year | -252.3% |
| 2005 | 1.36 % change on previous year | -40.3% |
| 2006 | 0.4884 % change on previous year | -64.1% |
| 2007 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2008 | -0.1215 % change on previous year | — |
| 2009 | 0.365 % change on previous year | -400.4% |
| 2010 | 2.67 % change on previous year | +630.7% |
| 2011 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2012 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2013 | -0.4723 % change on previous year | — |
| 2014 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2015 | -1.3 % change on previous year | — |
| 2016 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2017 | -0.4808 % change on previous year | — |
| 2018 | 0.9662 % change on previous year | -301.0% |
| 2019 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2020 | -3.35 % change on previous year | — |
| 2021 | -2.35 % change on previous year | -29.8% |
| 2022 | -5.32 % change on previous year | +126.4% |
| 2023 | 1.2 % change on previous year | -122.6% |
| 2024 | 1.59 % change on previous year | +31.7% |
| 2025 | 2.86 % change on previous year | +80.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1820s | 0.3906 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 1.56 % change on previous year | 4 |
| 1830s | 14.52 % change on previous year | -9.09 % change on previous year | 120 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1840s | -5.07 % change on previous year | -21.57 % change on previous year | 2.87 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1850s | 11.08 % change on previous year | -18.86 % change on previous year | 87.5 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1860s | 6.84 % change on previous year | -56.77 % change on previous year | 93.02 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | -3.28 % change on previous year | -53.8 % change on previous year | 11.72 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | 7.05 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 31.47 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 1.14 % change on previous year | -6.79 % change on previous year | 10.93 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.5205 % change on previous year | -4.78 % change on previous year | 3.68 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | 4 % change on previous year | -1.66 % change on previous year | 11.18 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | 1.13 % change on previous year | -1.2 % change on previous year | 3.97 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | 1.32 % change on previous year | -48.9 % change on previous year | 26.13 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | 4.89 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 30.92 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.1525 % change on previous year | -0.5979 % change on previous year | 1.06 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | -2.91 % change on previous year | -21.9 % change on previous year | 0.78 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | -14.79 % change on previous year | -81.9 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 101.39 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 961.11 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 1 % change on previous year | -0.2488 % change on previous year | 4.54 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.2879 % change on previous year | -1.5 % change on previous year | 2.28 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1375 % change on previous year | -1.3 % change on previous year | 2.67 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.8945 % change on previous year | -5.32 % change on previous year | 2.86 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
- 33 Singapore 3.45 % change on previous year compare
- 34 Romania 3.34 % change on previous year compare
- 35 Finland 3.32 % change on previous year compare
- 37 Thailand 2.61 % change on previous year compare
- 38 Algeria 2.44 % change on previous year compare
- 39 Gambia 2.35 % change on previous year compare
More social development data for Uruguay
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 3,195 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 126 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh 1 (2025)
- Democracy lexical 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 1 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 126 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0009 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Uruguay?
- Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Uruguay was 2.86 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 961.11 % change on previous year in 1985.
- What is the lowest key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was -81.9 % change on previous year in 1973.
- How does Uruguay rank for key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate?
- Uruguay ranks 36th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is up 319.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 200 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of liberal democracy. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Key features of liberal democracy Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of liberal democracy. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.