Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Paraguay
Paraguay: Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate was -3.59 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Paraguay, 1812–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Paraguay is -3.59 % change on previous year, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 49.7% on the previous year and down 843.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Paraguay peaked at 177.33 % change on previous year in 1990 and was at its lowest, -51.85 % change on previous year, in 1940.
That places Paraguay 130th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Paraguay, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1812 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1813 | -30 % change on previous year | — |
| 1814 | -21.43 % change on previous year | -28.6% |
| 1815 | -9.09 % change on previous year | -57.6% |
| 1816 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1817 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1818 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1819 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1820 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1821 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1822 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1823 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1824 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1825 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1826 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1827 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1828 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1829 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1830 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1831 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1832 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1833 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1834 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1835 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1836 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1837 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1838 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1839 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1840 | 20 % change on previous year | — |
| 1841 | 8.33 % change on previous year | -58.3% |
| 1842 | 7.69 % change on previous year | -7.7% |
| 1843 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1844 | 71.43 % change on previous year | — |
| 1845 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1846 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1847 | 4.17 % change on previous year | — |
| 1848 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1849 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1850 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1851 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1852 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1853 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1854 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1855 | -4 % change on previous year | — |
| 1856 | -4.17 % change on previous year | +4.2% |
| 1857 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1858 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1859 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1860 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1861 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1862 | 43.48 % change on previous year | — |
| 1863 | -24.24 % change on previous year | -155.8% |
| 1864 | -24 % change on previous year | -1.0% |
| 1865 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1866 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1867 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1868 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1869 | -5.26 % change on previous year | — |
| 1870 | 50 % change on previous year | -1050.0% |
| 1871 | 144.44 % change on previous year | +188.9% |
| 1872 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1873 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1874 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1875 | -1.52 % change on previous year | — |
| 1876 | 1.54 % change on previous year | -201.5% |
| 1877 | 9.09 % change on previous year | +490.9% |
| 1878 | -5.56 % change on previous year | -161.1% |
| 1879 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1880 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1881 | -1.47 % change on previous year | — |
| 1882 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1883 | 2.99 % change on previous year | — |
| 1884 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1885 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1886 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1887 | 4.35 % change on previous year | — |
| 1888 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1889 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1890 | 6.94 % change on previous year | — |
| 1891 | 2.6 % change on previous year | -62.6% |
| 1892 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1893 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1894 | -1.27 % change on previous year | — |
| 1895 | 2.56 % change on previous year | -302.6% |
| 1896 | -2.5 % change on previous year | -197.5% |
| 1897 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1898 | 1.28 % change on previous year | — |
| 1899 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1900 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1901 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1902 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1903 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1904 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1905 | 3.8 % change on previous year | — |
| 1906 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1907 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1908 | -32.93 % change on previous year | — |
| 1909 | 49.09 % change on previous year | -249.1% |
| 1910 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1911 | -3.66 % change on previous year | — |
| 1912 | 1.27 % change on previous year | -134.6% |
| 1913 | 3.75 % change on previous year | +196.3% |
| 1914 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1915 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1916 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1917 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1918 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1919 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1920 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1921 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1922 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1923 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1924 | 13.25 % change on previous year | — |
| 1925 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1926 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1927 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1928 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1929 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1930 | -1.06 % change on previous year | — |
| 1931 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1932 | -1.08 % change on previous year | — |
| 1933 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1934 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1935 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1936 | -44.57 % change on previous year | — |
| 1937 | 13.73 % change on previous year | -130.8% |
| 1938 | 25.86 % change on previous year | +88.4% |
| 1939 | 10.96 % change on previous year | -57.6% |
| 1940 | -51.85 % change on previous year | -573.1% |
| 1941 | -10.26 % change on previous year | -80.2% |
| 1942 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1943 | 8.57 % change on previous year | — |
| 1944 | 7.89 % change on previous year | -7.9% |
| 1945 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1946 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1947 | -14.63 % change on previous year | — |
| 1948 | 40 % change on previous year | -373.3% |
| 1949 | 8.16 % change on previous year | -79.6% |
| 1950 | -1.89 % change on previous year | -123.1% |
| 1951 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1952 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1953 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1954 | -15.38 % change on previous year | — |
| 1955 | -4.55 % change on previous year | -70.5% |
| 1956 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1957 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1958 | -2.38 % change on previous year | — |
| 1959 | -31.71 % change on previous year | +1231.7% |
| 1960 | -14.29 % change on previous year | -54.9% |
| 1961 | 37.5 % change on previous year | -362.5% |
| 1962 | 12.12 % change on previous year | -67.7% |
| 1963 | 5.41 % change on previous year | -55.4% |
| 1964 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1965 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1966 | 10.26 % change on previous year | — |
| 1967 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1968 | -2.33 % change on previous year | — |
| 1969 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1970 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1971 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1973 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1974 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1975 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1976 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1977 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1978 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1979 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1980 | 7.14 % change on previous year | — |
| 1981 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1982 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1983 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1984 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1985 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1986 | 4.44 % change on previous year | — |
| 1987 | 6.38 % change on previous year | +43.6% |
| 1988 | 2 % change on previous year | -68.7% |
| 1989 | 47.06 % change on previous year | +2252.9% |
| 1990 | 177.33 % change on previous year | +276.8% |
| 1991 | 3.37 % change on previous year | -98.1% |
| 1992 | 62.79 % change on previous year | +1765.8% |
| 1993 | 4 % change on previous year | -93.6% |
| 1994 | 3.57 % change on previous year | -10.7% |
| 1995 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1996 | 0.7958 % change on previous year | — |
| 1997 | 0.7895 % change on previous year | -0.8% |
| 1998 | 0.7833 % change on previous year | -0.8% |
| 1999 | -0.2591 % change on previous year | -133.1% |
| 2000 | 1.56 % change on previous year | -701.6% |
| 2001 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2002 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2003 | 4.6 % change on previous year | — |
| 2004 | 4.65 % change on previous year | +0.9% |
| 2005 | -0.2336 % change on previous year | -105.0% |
| 2006 | 1.41 % change on previous year | -701.4% |
| 2007 | 3 % change on previous year | +113.7% |
| 2008 | 10.54 % change on previous year | +251.0% |
| 2009 | 1.83 % change on previous year | -82.7% |
| 2010 | 1.39 % change on previous year | -23.6% |
| 2011 | -1.18 % change on previous year | -184.5% |
| 2012 | -4.57 % change on previous year | +287.9% |
| 2013 | -15.21 % change on previous year | +232.6% |
| 2014 | 1.72 % change on previous year | -111.3% |
| 2015 | 0.4831 % change on previous year | -71.9% |
| 2016 | -0.4808 % change on previous year | -199.5% |
| 2017 | 0.9662 % change on previous year | -301.0% |
| 2018 | -0.2392 % change on previous year | -124.8% |
| 2019 | 0.7194 % change on previous year | -400.7% |
| 2020 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2021 | 1.67 % change on previous year | — |
| 2022 | 0.7026 % change on previous year | -57.8% |
| 2023 | -2.33 % change on previous year | -431.0% |
| 2024 | -7.14 % change on previous year | +207.1% |
| 2025 | -3.59 % change on previous year | -49.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1810s | -7.56 % change on previous year | -30 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1820s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1830s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1840s | 11.16 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 71.43 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1850s | -0.8167 % change on previous year | -4.17 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1860s | -1 % change on previous year | -24.24 % change on previous year | 43.48 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | 19.8 % change on previous year | -5.56 % change on previous year | 144.44 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.5862 % change on previous year | -1.47 % change on previous year | 4.35 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.9622 % change on previous year | -2.5 % change on previous year | 6.94 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 2 % change on previous year | -32.93 % change on previous year | 49.09 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.1357 % change on previous year | -3.66 % change on previous year | 3.75 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | 1.33 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 13.25 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.3842 % change on previous year | -44.57 % change on previous year | 25.86 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.21 % change on previous year | -51.85 % change on previous year | 40 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | -5.59 % change on previous year | -31.71 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 4.87 % change on previous year | -14.29 % change on previous year | 37.5 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 6.7 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 47.06 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 25.32 % change on previous year | -0.2591 % change on previous year | 177.33 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.73 % change on previous year | -0.2336 % change on previous year | 10.54 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -1.64 % change on previous year | -15.21 % change on previous year | 1.72 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.78 % change on previous year | -7.14 % change on previous year | 1.67 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Paraguay
- 127 Burundi -3.23 % change on previous year compare
- 128 Philippines -3.32 % change on previous year compare
- 129 Congo -3.36 % change on previous year compare
- 131 Kyrgyzstan -3.78 % change on previous year compare
- 132 Zambia -3.85 % change on previous year compare
- 133 Eswatini -3.96 % change on previous year compare
More social development data for Paraguay
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 4,621 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 162 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh 3 (2025)
- Democracy lexical 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 3 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 162 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0007 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Paraguay?
- Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Paraguay was -3.59 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate recorded in Paraguay?
- The highest recorded value was 177.33 % change on previous year in 1990.
- What is the lowest key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate recorded in Paraguay?
- The lowest recorded value was -51.85 % change on previous year in 1940.
- How does Paraguay rank for key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate?
- Paraguay ranks 130th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate rising or falling in Paraguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 843.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Paraguay data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 214 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of liberal democracy. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Key features of liberal democracy Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of liberal democracy. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.