Judicial Corruption Score in Morocco
Morocco: Judicial Corruption Score was -0.267 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Latest (2025)
-0.267
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
96th
of 176 countries
All-time high
-0.267
in 2024
All-time low
-0.958
in 1957
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Judicial Corruption Score in Morocco, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for judicial corruption score in Morocco is -0.267, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 237 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 61.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, judicial corruption score in Morocco peaked at -0.267 in 2024 and was at its lowest, -0.958, in 1957.
That places Morocco 96th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Judicial Corruption Score in Morocco, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -0.438 | — |
| 1790 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -0.438 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.742 | +69.4% |
| 1957 | -0.958 | +29.1% |
| 1958 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1991 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.958 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -0.686 | -28.4% |
| 2001 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2014 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -0.686 | -0.0% |
| 2017 | -0.314 | -54.2% |
| 2018 | -0.314 | -0.0% |
| 2019 | -0.314 | -0.0% |
| 2020 | -0.314 | -0.0% |
| 2021 | -0.314 | -0.0% |
| 2022 | -0.314 | -0.0% |
| 2023 | -0.314 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -0.267 | -15.0% |
| 2025 | -0.267 | -0.0% |
Morocco compared with similar countries
- Morocco's -0.267 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -1.01, 27% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Morocco's -0.267 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is -0.76, 35% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 1 |
| 1790s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1800s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1810s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1820s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1830s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1840s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1850s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1870s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1920s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1930s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1940s | -0.438 | -0.438 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.6244 | -0.958 | -0.438 | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.958 | -0.958 | -0.958 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.958 | -0.958 | -0.958 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.958 | -0.958 | -0.958 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.958 | -0.958 | -0.958 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.686 | -0.686 | -0.686 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.5744 | -0.686 | -0.314 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.2983 | -0.314 | -0.267 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Morocco
More social development data for Morocco
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 7,304 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 10,400 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 5 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 0 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 5 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0003 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 10,400 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0002 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is judicial corruption score in Morocco?
- Judicial corruption score in Morocco was -0.267 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest judicial corruption score recorded in Morocco?
- The highest recorded value was -0.267 in 2024.
- What is the lowest judicial corruption score recorded in Morocco?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.958 in 1957.
- How does Morocco rank for judicial corruption score?
- Morocco ranks 96th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is judicial corruption score rising or falling in Morocco?
- Over the last ten years it is up 61.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Morocco data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.