Judicial Corruption Score in Kuwait
Kuwait: Judicial Corruption Score was 0.796 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Judicial Corruption Score in Kuwait, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, judicial corruption score in Kuwait stood at 0.796. That is the lowest value across all 237 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, judicial corruption score in Kuwait peaked at 1.35 in 1789 and was at its lowest, 0.796, in 1960.
That places Kuwait 68th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Judicial Corruption Score in Kuwait, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 1.35 | — |
| 1790 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.796 | -40.9% |
| 1961 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
Kuwait compared with similar countries
- Kuwait's 0.796 is below the median for high income countries, which is 1.71, 47% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Kuwait's 0.796 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is -0.76. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1 |
| 1790s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1800s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1810s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1820s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1830s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1840s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1850s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1860s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1870s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1880s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1890s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1900s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1910s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1920s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1930s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1940s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.796 | 0.796 | 0.796 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.796 | 0.796 | 0.796 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.796 | 0.796 | 0.796 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.796 | 0.796 | 0.796 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.796 | 0.796 | 0.796 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.796 | 0.796 | 0.796 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.796 | 0.796 | 0.796 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kuwait
More social development data for Kuwait
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 386 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 3,369 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 6 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 0 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 6 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0007 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 3,369 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0001 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is judicial corruption score in Kuwait?
- Judicial corruption score in Kuwait was 0.796 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest judicial corruption score recorded in Kuwait?
- The highest recorded value was 1.35 in 1789.
- What is the lowest judicial corruption score recorded in Kuwait?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.796 in 1960.
- How does Kuwait rank for judicial corruption score?
- Kuwait ranks 68th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is judicial corruption score rising or falling in Kuwait?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Kuwait data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.