Judicial Corruption Score in Hungary
Hungary: Judicial Corruption Score was 0.991 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Judicial Corruption Score in Hungary, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for judicial corruption score in Hungary is 0.991, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 35.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, judicial corruption score in Hungary peaked at 1.78 in 1990 and was at its lowest, -1.13, in 1946.
That places Hungary 56th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Judicial Corruption Score in Hungary, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.517 | — |
| 1790 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.039 | -92.5% |
| 1920 | 0.925 | +2271.8% |
| 1921 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | -0.037 | -104.0% |
| 1945 | -0.663 | +1691.9% |
| 1946 | -1.13 | +70.7% |
| 1947 | -1.13 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.13 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -1.13 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -1.13 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -1.13 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.13 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.13 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -1.13 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -0.63 | -44.3% |
| 1956 | -0.63 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -0.63 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -0.261 | -58.6% |
| 1959 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.261 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | 1.78 | -782.0% |
| 1991 | 1.78 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.78 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1.78 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1.78 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1.78 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.78 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.78 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.78 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.78 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1.54 | -13.7% |
| 2001 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1.4 | -9.2% |
| 2022 | 0.991 | -29.0% |
| 2023 | 0.991 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.991 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.991 | +0.0% |
Hungary compared with similar countries
- Hungary's 0.991 is below the median for high income countries, which is 1.71, 58% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Hungary's 0.991 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.02, 97% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.517 | 0.517 | 0.517 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.517 | 0.517 | 0.517 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.517 | 0.517 | 0.517 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.517 | 0.517 | 0.517 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.517 | 0.517 | 0.517 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.517 | 0.517 | 0.517 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.517 | 0.517 | 0.517 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.517 | 0.517 | 0.517 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.517 | 0.517 | 0.517 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.517 | 0.517 | 0.517 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.517 | 0.517 | 0.517 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.517 | 0.517 | 0.517 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.517 | 0.517 | 0.517 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.4692 | 0.039 | 0.517 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.925 | 0.925 | 0.925 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.925 | 0.925 | 0.925 | 10 |
| 1940s | -0.1528 | -1.13 | 0.925 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.8072 | -1.13 | -0.261 | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.261 | -0.261 | -0.261 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.261 | -0.261 | -0.261 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.261 | -0.261 | -0.261 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.78 | 1.78 | 1.78 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.54 | 1.54 | 1.54 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.54 | 1.54 | 1.54 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.15 | 0.991 | 1.54 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Hungary
More social development data for Hungary
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 71,332 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 2,055 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 3 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 3 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0002 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 2,055 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0075 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is judicial corruption score in Hungary?
- Judicial corruption score in Hungary was 0.991 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest judicial corruption score recorded in Hungary?
- The highest recorded value was 1.78 in 1990.
- What is the lowest judicial corruption score recorded in Hungary?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.13 in 1946.
- How does Hungary rank for judicial corruption score?
- Hungary ranks 56th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is judicial corruption score rising or falling in Hungary?
- Over the last ten years it is down 35.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Hungary data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.