Judicial Corruption Score in Czechia
Czechia: Judicial Corruption Score was 1.63 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Judicial Corruption Score in Czechia, 1918–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Czechia recorded 1.63 for judicial corruption score in 2025. That is the highest value across all 108 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, judicial corruption score in Czechia peaked at 1.63 in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0.159, in 1948.
That places Czechia 32nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Judicial Corruption Score in Czechia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1918 | 1.3 | — |
| 1919 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.21 | -83.9% |
| 1939 | 0.21 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.21 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.21 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.21 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.21 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.21 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.21 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 1.26 | +499.5% |
| 1947 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.159 | -87.4% |
| 1949 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.159 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 1.07 | +573.6% |
| 1991 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1.47 | +37.3% |
| 2011 | 1.35 | -8.0% |
| 2012 | 1.47 | +9.0% |
| 2013 | 1.47 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 1.47 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.47 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1.47 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.41 | -4.4% |
| 2018 | 1.63 | +15.5% |
| 2019 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
Czechia compared with similar countries
- Czechia's 1.63 is below the median for high income countries, which is 1.71, 95% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Czechia's 1.63 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.02, 1.6× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 2 |
| 1920s | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 10 |
| 1930s | 1.08 | 0.21 | 1.3 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.4096 | 0.159 | 1.26 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.159 | 0.159 | 0.159 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.159 | 0.159 | 0.159 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.159 | 0.159 | 0.159 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.159 | 0.159 | 0.159 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.49 | 1.35 | 1.63 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.63 | 1.63 | 1.63 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Czechia
More social development data for Czechia
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 395,559 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 794 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 1 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 1 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0001 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 794 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0363 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is judicial corruption score in Czechia?
- Judicial corruption score in Czechia was 1.63 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest judicial corruption score recorded in Czechia?
- The highest recorded value was 1.63 in 2018.
- What is the lowest judicial corruption score recorded in Czechia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.159 in 1948.
- How does Czechia rank for judicial corruption score?
- Czechia ranks 32nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is judicial corruption score rising or falling in Czechia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Czechia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 108 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.