Malta vs Sri Lanka: Varieties of democracy

Malta
0.783
in 2025
Sri Lanka
0.783
in 2025
Malta rank
33rd
Sri Lanka rank
33rd

Varieties of democracy over time

  • Malta
  • Sri Lanka
0.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.783 against 0.783 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 33rd and Sri Lanka ranks 33rd of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 8 and Sri Lanka in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1900s 0.1916 0.139 0.0526 Malta
1910s 0.192 0.2281 0.0361 Sri Lanka
1920s 0.3553 0.2559 0.0994 Malta
1930s 0.2299 0.3302 0.1003 Sri Lanka
1940s 0.3138 0.4131 0.0993 Sri Lanka
1950s 0.5974 0.6427 0.0453 Sri Lanka
1960s 0.574 0.6615 0.0875 Sri Lanka
1970s 0.6852 0.5854 0.0998 Malta
1980s 0.6742 0.4836 0.1906 Malta
1990s 0.7707 0.4969 0.2738 Malta
2000s 0.7915 0.4476 0.3439 Malta
2010s 0.7855 0.4907 0.2948 Malta
2020s 0.7777 0.633 0.1447 Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher varieties of democracy, Malta or Sri Lanka?
Malta, at 0.783 against 0.783 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
What is the difference in varieties of democracy between Malta and Sri Lanka?
0, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sri Lanka?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Malta and Sri Lanka rank globally for varieties of democracy?
Malta ranks 33rd and Sri Lanka ranks 33rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Varieties of democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Varieties of democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.