Jordan vs Mozambique: Varieties of democracy

Jordan
0.282
in 2025
Mozambique
0.279
in 2025
Jordan rank
120th
Mozambique rank
121st

Varieties of democracy over time

  • Jordan
  • Mozambique
00.10.20.30.40.5190019622025

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.282 against 0.279 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.003.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 120th and Mozambique ranks 121st of 176 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 7 and Mozambique in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Mozambique Difference Ahead
1920s 0.0911 0.0285 0.0626 Jordan
1930s 0.102 0.027 0.075 Jordan
1940s 0.1078 0.0265 0.0813 Jordan
1950s 0.1487 0.026 0.1227 Jordan
1960s 0.1272 0.0268 0.1004 Jordan
1970s 0.1248 0.0509 0.0739 Jordan
1980s 0.1304 0.0803 0.0501 Jordan
1990s 0.2254 0.3222 0.0968 Mozambique
2000s 0.2143 0.4404 0.2261 Mozambique
2010s 0.252 0.4221 0.1701 Mozambique
2020s 0.2632 0.3395 0.0763 Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher varieties of democracy, Jordan or Mozambique?
Jordan, at 0.282 against 0.279 in Mozambique as of 2025.
What is the difference in varieties of democracy between Jordan and Mozambique?
0.003, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mozambique?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Jordan and Mozambique rank globally for varieties of democracy?
Jordan ranks 120th and Mozambique ranks 121st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Varieties of democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Varieties of democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.