Iceland vs Japan: Varieties of democracy

Iceland
0.807
in 2025
Japan
0.819
in 2025
Iceland rank
26th
Japan rank
24th

Varieties of democracy over time

  • Iceland
  • Japan
00.20.40.60.8178919072025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 0.819 against 0.807 in Iceland, a difference of 0.012.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 26th and Japan ranks 24th of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 11 and Japan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Japan Difference Ahead
1900s 0.4663 0.173 0.2933 Iceland
1910s 0.6412 0.177 0.4642 Iceland
1920s 0.7719 0.1964 0.5755 Iceland
1930s 0.7793 0.1909 0.5884 Iceland
1940s 0.7847 0.2313 0.5534 Iceland
1950s 0.8049 0.7018 0.1031 Iceland
1960s 0.8138 0.8305 0.0167 Japan
1970s 0.8254 0.8352 0.0098 Japan
1980s 0.8507 0.8355 0.0152 Iceland
1990s 0.8645 0.8369 0.0276 Iceland
2000s 0.8703 0.8429 0.0274 Iceland
2010s 0.8667 0.8299 0.0368 Iceland
2020s 0.8362 0.8242 0.012 Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher varieties of democracy, Iceland or Japan?
Japan, at 0.819 against 0.807 in Iceland as of 2025.
What is the difference in varieties of democracy between Iceland and Japan?
0.012, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Japan?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Japan rank globally for varieties of democracy?
Iceland ranks 26th and Japan ranks 24th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Varieties of democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Varieties of democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.