Which has higher varieties democracy vdem, per unit of gdp, Eswatini or Republic of Moldova?

Republic of Moldova, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2025.

What is the difference in varieties democracy vdem, per unit of gdp between Eswatini and Republic of Moldova?

0 units per US$ of GDP, with Republic of Moldova ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Republic of Moldova?

36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Varieties democracy vdem, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Republic of Moldova: Varieties democracy vdem, per unit of GDP

Eswatini

0 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Republic of Moldova

0 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Eswatini rank

34th

Republic of Moldova rank

33rd

Varieties democracy vdem, per unit of GDP over time

Eswatini
Republic of Moldova

How they compare

Republic of Moldova currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Eswatini, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 34th and Republic of Moldova ranks 33rd of 172 countries.

Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Republic of Moldova	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	Republic of Moldova
2000s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	Republic of Moldova
2010s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	Republic of Moldova
2020s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	Republic of Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher varieties democracy vdem, per unit of gdp, Eswatini or Republic of Moldova?: Republic of Moldova, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2025.
What is the difference in varieties democracy vdem, per unit of gdp between Eswatini and Republic of Moldova?: 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Republic of Moldova?: 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Eswatini and Republic of Moldova rank globally for varieties democracy vdem, per unit of gdp?: Eswatini ranks 34th and Republic of Moldova ranks 33rd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Varieties democracy vdem, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Republic of Moldova: Varieties democracy vdem, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/varieties-democracy-vdem-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/varieties-democracy-vdem-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/moldova/">Eswatini vs Republic of Moldova: Varieties democracy vdem, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Varieties democracy vdem, per unit of GDP
Unit: units per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 172 places, 9,839 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

Varieties democracy vdem divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.