How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom and Zimbabwe?

14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of countries with independent national human rights institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

United Kingdom vs Zimbabwe: Share of countries with independent national human rights institutions

United Kingdom

100.0%

in 2025

Zimbabwe

100.0%

in 2025

United Kingdom rank

1st

Zimbabwe rank

1st

Share of countries with independent national human rights institutions over time

United Kingdom
Zimbabwe

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

United Kingdom ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 194 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	United Kingdom	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	—
2010s	100.0%	66.7%	33.3%	United Kingdom
2020s	100.0%	100.0%	0.0%	—

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of countries with independent national human rights institutions, United Kingdom or Zimbabwe?: United Kingdom, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in share of countries with independent national human rights institutions between United Kingdom and Zimbabwe?: 0.0%, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom and Zimbabwe?: 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do United Kingdom and Zimbabwe rank globally for share of countries with independent national human rights institutions?: United Kingdom ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?: United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of countries with independent national human rights institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Kingdom vs Zimbabwe: Share of countries with independent national human rights institutions. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/share-countries-accredited-independent-national-human-rights-institutions/united-kingdom/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/share-countries-accredited-independent-national-human-rights-institutions/united-kingdom/zimbabwe/">United Kingdom vs Zimbabwe: Share of countries with independent national human rights institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Share of countries with independent national human rights institutions
Unit: %
Source: United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 194 places, 2,716 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed: 30 October 2026

Proportion of countries with independent National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (%).