Democratic Republic of Congo vs Myanmar: Press freedom

Democratic Republic of Congo
0
in 2016
Myanmar
0
in 2016
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
131st
Myanmar rank
131st

Press freedom over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Myanmar
00.20.40.60.81197919972016

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 0 against 0 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Myanmar ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 131st and Myanmar ranks 131st of 194 countries.

Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Myanmar Difference Ahead
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0 0 β€”
2010s 0.1429 0 0.1429 Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher press freedom, Democratic Republic of Congo or Myanmar?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 0 against 0 in Myanmar as of 2016.
What is the difference in press freedom between Democratic Republic of Congo and Myanmar?
0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Myanmar?
36 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2016.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Myanmar rank globally for press freedom?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 131st and Myanmar ranks 131st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Freedom House (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Press freedom. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Press freedom
Source
Freedom House (2017) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
194 places, 6,417 data points, 1979–2016
Last refreshed

Based on the classification and data by Freedom House. It captures the legal, political, and economic environment of the press.