Equatorial Guinea vs Tajikistan: Media Corruption Score

Equatorial Guinea
-2.22
in 2025
Tajikistan
-2.12
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
168th
Tajikistan rank
166th

Media Corruption Score over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Tajikistan
-3-2-10190019622025

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports -2.12 against -2.22 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.1.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 168th and Tajikistan ranks 166th of 175 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s -1.88 -1.7 0.1761 Tajikistan
2000s -1.88 -0.2282 1.65 Tajikistan
2010s -1.88 -1.21 0.6678 Tajikistan
2020s -1.86 -2.28 0.418 Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher media corruption score, Equatorial Guinea or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at -2.12 against -2.22 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in media corruption score between Equatorial Guinea and Tajikistan?
0.1, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Tajikistan?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Tajikistan rank globally for media corruption score?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 168th and Tajikistan ranks 166th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Media Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Media Corruption Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 18,887 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Gauges the frequency with which journalists, publishers, or broadcasters accept payments to modify news content, indicating the integrity (or corruption) of the media sphere.