Equatorial Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Liberal democracy

Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2025
Kazakhstan
1
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
87th
Kazakhstan rank
87th

Liberal democracy over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Kazakhstan
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 119 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and Kazakhstan ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0.1 0.1 Kazakhstan
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0.2 0 0.2 Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.6667 0 0.6667 Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0.6 1 0.4 Kazakhstan
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher liberal democracy, Equatorial Guinea or Kazakhstan?
Equatorial Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
What is the difference in liberal democracy between Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan?
0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan?
119 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan rank globally for liberal democracy?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and Kazakhstan ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Liberal democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Liberal democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country by distinguishing between closed autocracies, electoral autocracies, electoral democracies, and liberal democracies.