Afghanistan vs Myanmar: Liberal democracy

Afghanistan
0
in 2025
Myanmar
0
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
142nd
Myanmar rank
142nd

Liberal democracy over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Myanmar
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 0 against 0 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 236 shared years of data; in 1789 it was Myanmar ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 142nd and Myanmar ranks 142nd of 176 countries.

Across the 25 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Myanmar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Myanmar Difference Ahead
1780s 0 0 0
1790s 0 0 0
1800s 0 0 0
1810s 0 0 0
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0 0.9 0.9 Myanmar
1960s 0 0.2 0.2 Myanmar
1970s 0 0 0
1980s 0 0 0
1990s 0 0 0
2000s 0.5556 0 0.5556 Afghanistan
2010s 1 0.9 0.1 Afghanistan
2020s 0.1667 0.1667 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher liberal democracy, Afghanistan or Myanmar?
Afghanistan, at 0 against 0 in Myanmar as of 2025.
What is the difference in liberal democracy between Afghanistan and Myanmar?
0, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Myanmar?
236 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
How do Afghanistan and Myanmar rank globally for liberal democracy?
Afghanistan ranks 142nd and Myanmar ranks 142nd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Liberal democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Liberal democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country by distinguishing between closed autocracies, electoral autocracies, electoral democracies, and liberal democracies.