Niger vs Pakistan: Liberal Democracy Index

Niger
0.177
in 2025
Pakistan
0.176
in 2025
Niger rank
113th
Pakistan rank
114th

Liberal Democracy Index over time

  • Niger
  • Pakistan
0.10.20.30.40.5183919322025

How they compare

Niger currently reports 0.177 against 0.176 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.001.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Pakistan ahead.

Niger ranks 113th and Pakistan ranks 114th of 176 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 5 and Pakistan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Pakistan Difference Ahead
1920s 0.064 0.1075 0.0435 Pakistan
1930s 0.067 0.1322 0.0652 Pakistan
1940s 0.0693 0.1599 0.0906 Pakistan
1950s 0.0799 0.1465 0.0666 Pakistan
1960s 0.129 0.1113 0.0177 Niger
1970s 0.1036 0.1082 0.0046 Pakistan
1980s 0.0914 0.0952 0.0038 Pakistan
1990s 0.2727 0.1956 0.0771 Niger
2000s 0.4011 0.1742 0.2269 Niger
2010s 0.4244 0.2681 0.1563 Niger
2020s 0.3055 0.217 0.0885 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher liberal democracy index, Niger or Pakistan?
Niger, at 0.177 against 0.176 in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in liberal democracy index between Niger and Pakistan?
0.001, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Pakistan?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Niger and Pakistan rank globally for liberal democracy index?
Niger ranks 113th and Pakistan ranks 114th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Liberal Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Liberal Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 28,671 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, individual and minority rights, equality before the law, and executive constraints.