India vs Jordan: Liberal Democracy Index

India
0.26
in 2025
Jordan
0.274
in 2025
India rank
103rd
Jordan rank
100th

Liberal Democracy Index over time

  • India
  • Jordan
00.20.40.6178919072025

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.274 against 0.26 in India, a difference of 0.014.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times India's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was India ahead.

India ranks 103rd and Jordan ranks 100th of 176 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, India averaged higher in 9 and Jordan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Jordan Difference Ahead
1920s 0.1075 0.1048 0.0027 India
1930s 0.1322 0.1532 0.021 Jordan
1940s 0.1561 0.1564 0.0003 Jordan
1950s 0.4574 0.1702 0.2872 India
1960s 0.5018 0.1609 0.3409 India
1970s 0.4211 0.135 0.2861 India
1980s 0.5084 0.1499 0.3585 India
1990s 0.5771 0.1962 0.3809 India
2000s 0.5735 0.1769 0.3966 India
2010s 0.448 0.2211 0.2269 India
2020s 0.284 0.2545 0.0295 India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher liberal democracy index, India or Jordan?
Jordan, at 0.274 against 0.26 in India as of 2025.
What is the difference in liberal democracy index between India and Jordan?
0.014, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Jordan?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do India and Jordan rank globally for liberal democracy index?
India ranks 103rd and Jordan ranks 100th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Liberal Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Liberal Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 28,671 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, individual and minority rights, equality before the law, and executive constraints.