Comoros vs Kuwait: Liberal Democracy Index
Comoros
0.132
in 2025
Kuwait
0.127
in 2025
Comoros rank
123rd
Kuwait rank
126th
Liberal Democracy Index over time
- Comoros
- Kuwait
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 0.132 against 0.127 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.005.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Kuwait ahead.
Comoros ranks 123rd and Kuwait ranks 126th of 176 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.0389 | 0.102 | 0.0631 | Kuwait |
| 1910s | 0.0405 | 0.1047 | 0.0643 | Kuwait |
| 1940s | 0.0445 | 0.108 | 0.0635 | Kuwait |
| 1950s | 0.051 | 0.1108 | 0.0598 | Kuwait |
| 1960s | 0.0585 | 0.231 | 0.1725 | Kuwait |
| 1970s | 0.0816 | 0.2124 | 0.1308 | Kuwait |
| 1980s | 0.0945 | 0.1938 | 0.0993 | Kuwait |
| 1990s | 0.182 | 0.2339 | 0.0519 | Kuwait |
| 2000s | 0.1883 | 0.2753 | 0.087 | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 0.2288 | 0.2823 | 0.0535 | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 0.124 | 0.2395 | 0.1155 | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liberal democracy index, Comoros or Kuwait?
- Comoros, at 0.132 against 0.127 in Kuwait as of 2025.
- What is the difference in liberal democracy index between Comoros and Kuwait?
- 0.005, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Kuwait?
- 94 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Kuwait rank globally for liberal democracy index?
- Comoros ranks 123rd and Kuwait ranks 126th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Liberal Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, individual and minority rights, equality before the law, and executive constraints.