Sao Tome and Principe vs Tajikistan: LGBT+ Rights Index
Sao Tome and Principe
2.07
in 2019
Tajikistan
2.07
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
75th
Tajikistan rank
75th
LGBT+ Rights Index over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 2.07 against 2.07 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 75th and Tajikistan ranks 75th of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8195 | 0.2385 | 0.581 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2000s | 0.8195 | 2.07 | 1.25 | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 1.82 | 2.07 | 0.2505 | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lgbt+ rights index, Sao Tome and Principe or Tajikistan?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 2.07 against 2.07 in Tajikistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in lgbt+ rights index between Sao Tome and Principe and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Tajikistan?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Tajikistan rank globally for lgbt+ rights index?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 75th and Tajikistan ranks 75th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Velasco (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as LGBT+ Rights Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The LGBT+ Policy Index measures a country’s LGBT+ policy landscape by capturing the implementation of 18 different LGBT+ policies. Policies included in the index are limited to those adopted across at least three countries or are explicitly advocated for by transnational activists.