Kazakhstan vs Sao Tome and Principe: LGBT+ Rights Index
Kazakhstan
2.07
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
2.07
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
75th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
75th
LGBT+ Rights Index over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 2.07 against 2.07 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 75th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 75th of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4592 | 0.8195 | 0.3603 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2000s | 2.07 | 0.8195 | 1.25 | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 2.07 | 1.82 | 0.2505 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lgbt+ rights index, Kazakhstan or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Kazakhstan, at 2.07 against 2.07 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in lgbt+ rights index between Kazakhstan and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for lgbt+ rights index?
- Kazakhstan ranks 75th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 75th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Velasco (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as LGBT+ Rights Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The LGBT+ Policy Index measures a country’s LGBT+ policy landscape by capturing the implementation of 18 different LGBT+ policies. Policies included in the index are limited to those adopted across at least three countries or are explicitly advocated for by transnational activists.