Indonesia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: LGBT+ Rights Index
Indonesia
0.5253
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.3375
in 2025
Indonesia rank
118th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
119th
LGBT+ Rights Index over time
- Indonesia
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 0.5253 against 0.3375 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.1878.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.6 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 118th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 119th of 194 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.5375 | -0.6625 | 0.125 | Indonesia |
| 2000s | -0.4466 | -0.6625 | 0.2159 | Indonesia |
| 2010s | -0.7478 | -0.5813 | 0.1665 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | -0.1932 | 0.0667 | 0.2599 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lgbt+ rights index, Indonesia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Indonesia, at 0.5253 against 0.3375 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in lgbt+ rights index between Indonesia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.1878, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Indonesia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for lgbt+ rights index?
- Indonesia ranks 118th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 119th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Velasco (2026) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as LGBT+ Rights Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Summary measure of a country's LGBTI-related laws, calculated by subtracting the sum of its regressive policy scores from the sum of its progressive policy scores.