Cape Verde vs Monaco: LGBT+ Rights Index

Cape Verde
3.07
in 2019
Monaco
3.07
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
59th
Monaco rank
59th

LGBT+ Rights Index over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Monaco
0123199120052019

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 3.07 against 3.07 in Monaco, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Monaco ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 59th and Monaco ranks 59th of 192 countries.

Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Monaco Difference Ahead
1990s -0.3901 1.07 1.46 Monaco
2000s 1.29 2.07 0.7848 Monaco
2010s 3.07 3.07 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lgbt+ rights index, Cape Verde or Monaco?
Cape Verde, at 3.07 against 3.07 in Monaco as of 2019.
What is the difference in lgbt+ rights index between Cape Verde and Monaco?
0, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Monaco?
29 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2019.
How do Cape Verde and Monaco rank globally for lgbt+ rights index?
Cape Verde ranks 59th and Monaco ranks 59th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Velasco (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as LGBT+ Rights Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
LGBT+ Rights Index
Source
Velasco (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 5,568 data points, 1991–2019
Last refreshed

The LGBT+ Policy Index measures a country’s LGBT+ policy landscape by capturing the implementation of 18 different LGBT+ policies. Policies included in the index are limited to those adopted across at least three countries or are explicitly advocated for by transnational activists.