North Macedonia vs Tajikistan: Legislative Corruption Score

North Macedonia
-1.23
in 2025
Tajikistan
-1.13
in 2025
North Macedonia rank
133rd
Tajikistan rank
130th

Legislative Corruption Score over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Tajikistan
-101199020072025

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports -1.13 against -1.23 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.1.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Tajikistan ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 133rd and Tajikistan ranks 130th of 174 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s -0.42 -0.0291 0.3909 Tajikistan
2000s -0.3675 -1.22 0.8565 North Macedonia
2010s -0.7674 -1.34 0.5712 North Macedonia
2020s -0.9987 -0.9652 0.0335 Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher legislative corruption score, North Macedonia or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at -1.13 against -1.23 in North Macedonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in legislative corruption score between North Macedonia and Tajikistan?
0.1, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Tajikistan?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do North Macedonia and Tajikistan rank globally for legislative corruption score?
North Macedonia ranks 133rd and Tajikistan ranks 130th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Legislative Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Legislative Corruption Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
174 places, 17,541 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which members of the legislature abuse their position for financial gain, such as bribes, government contracts, future employment, or stealing from the state. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.