Hong Kong vs Lithuania: Legislative Corruption Score

Hong Kong
1.21
in 2025
Lithuania
1.21
in 2025
Hong Kong rank
31st
Lithuania rank
32nd

Legislative Corruption Score over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Lithuania
0.511.52190019622025

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 1.21 against 1.21 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 31st and Lithuania ranks 32nd of 174 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 4 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Lithuania Difference Ahead
1920s 1.51 1.19 0.325 Hong Kong
1990s 1.46 0.9007 0.5623 Hong Kong
2000s 1.46 0.6955 0.7675 Hong Kong
2010s 1.46 0.9192 0.5438 Hong Kong
2020s 1.28 1.36 0.0868 Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher legislative corruption score, Hong Kong or Lithuania?
Hong Kong, at 1.21 against 1.21 in Lithuania as of 2025.
What is the difference in legislative corruption score between Hong Kong and Lithuania?
0, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Lithuania?
42 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong and Lithuania rank globally for legislative corruption score?
Hong Kong ranks 31st and Lithuania ranks 32nd of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Legislative Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Legislative Corruption Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
174 places, 17,541 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which members of the legislature abuse their position for financial gain, such as bribes, government contracts, future employment, or stealing from the state. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.