Equatorial Guinea vs Panama: Legislative Corruption Score
Equatorial Guinea
-0.712
in 2025
Panama
-0.772
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
110th
Panama rank
113th
Legislative Corruption Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Panama
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports -0.712 against -0.772 in Panama, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 110th and Panama ranks 113th of 174 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 5 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.206 | -1.3 | 1.09 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | -2.11 | -0.943 | 1.17 | Panama |
| 1980s | -0.712 | -0.943 | 0.231 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | -0.712 | -0.943 | 0.231 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | -0.712 | -0.943 | 0.231 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | -0.712 | -0.8347 | 0.1227 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | -0.712 | -0.677 | 0.035 | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher legislative corruption score, Equatorial Guinea or Panama?
- Equatorial Guinea, at -0.712 against -0.772 in Panama as of 2025.
- What is the difference in legislative corruption score between Equatorial Guinea and Panama?
- 0.06, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Panama?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Panama rank globally for legislative corruption score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 110th and Panama ranks 113th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Legislative Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which members of the legislature abuse their position for financial gain, such as bribes, government contracts, future employment, or stealing from the state. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.