Equatorial Guinea vs Mali: Legislative Corruption Score
Equatorial Guinea
-0.712
in 2025
Mali
-0.702
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
110th
Mali rank
109th
Legislative Corruption Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports -0.702 against -0.712 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Mali ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 110th and Mali ranks 109th of 174 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Mali in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.206 | 0.72 | 0.926 | Mali |
| 1970s | -2.11 | -0.424 | 1.69 | Mali |
| 1980s | -0.712 | -0.424 | 0.288 | Mali |
| 1990s | -0.712 | -0.8954 | 0.1834 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | -0.712 | -1.17 | 0.455 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | -0.712 | -0.9743 | 0.2623 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | -0.712 | -1.03 | 0.314 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher legislative corruption score, Equatorial Guinea or Mali?
- Mali, at -0.702 against -0.712 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in legislative corruption score between Equatorial Guinea and Mali?
- 0.01, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mali?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Mali rank globally for legislative corruption score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 110th and Mali ranks 109th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Legislative Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which members of the legislature abuse their position for financial gain, such as bribes, government contracts, future employment, or stealing from the state. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.