Djibouti vs Maldives: Legislative Corruption Score

Djibouti
-0.148
in 2025
Maldives
-0.122
in 2025
Djibouti rank
92nd
Maldives rank
90th

Legislative Corruption Score over time

  • Djibouti
  • Maldives
-2-1.5-1-0.50193319792025

How they compare

Maldives currently reports -0.122 against -0.148 in Djibouti, a difference of 0.026.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 80 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Maldives ahead.

Djibouti ranks 92nd and Maldives ranks 90th of 174 regions.

Across the 9 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 5 and Maldives in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Maldives Difference Ahead
1940s -2.22 -1.12 1.09 Maldives
1950s -2.22 -1.12 1.09 Maldives
1960s -2.22 -1.1 1.11 Maldives
1970s -1.88 -1.03 0.855 Maldives
1980s -0.762 -1.03 0.266 Djibouti
1990s -0.762 -1.03 0.266 Djibouti
2000s -0.762 -1.06 0.2996 Djibouti
2010s -0.7216 -1.23 0.5053 Djibouti
2020s -0.2063 -0.544 0.3377 Djibouti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher legislative corruption score, Djibouti or Maldives?
Maldives, at -0.122 against -0.148 in Djibouti as of 2025.
What is the difference in legislative corruption score between Djibouti and Maldives?
0.026, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Maldives?
80 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
How do Djibouti and Maldives rank globally for legislative corruption score?
Djibouti ranks 92nd and Maldives ranks 90th of 174 regions.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Legislative Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Legislative Corruption Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
174 places, 17,541 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which members of the legislature abuse their position for financial gain, such as bribes, government contracts, future employment, or stealing from the state. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.