Burundi vs Equatorial Guinea: Legislative Corruption Score
Burundi
-0.719
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
-0.712
in 2025
Burundi rank
111th
Equatorial Guinea rank
110th
Legislative Corruption Score over time
- Burundi
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports -0.712 against -0.719 in Burundi, a difference of 0.007.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 111th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 110th of 174 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 4 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.09 | -0.206 | 2.3 | Burundi |
| 1980s | 1.7 | -0.712 | 2.41 | Burundi |
| 1990s | 0.7809 | -0.712 | 1.49 | Burundi |
| 2000s | -0.4195 | -0.712 | 0.2925 | Burundi |
| 2010s | -1.35 | -0.712 | 0.6387 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | -0.8405 | -0.712 | 0.1285 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher legislative corruption score, Burundi or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at -0.712 against -0.719 in Burundi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in legislative corruption score between Burundi and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.007, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Equatorial Guinea?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2025.
- How do Burundi and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for legislative corruption score?
- Burundi ranks 111th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 110th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Legislative Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which members of the legislature abuse their position for financial gain, such as bribes, government contracts, future employment, or stealing from the state. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.