Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Libya: Legislative Corruption Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-0.903
in 2025
Libya
-0.866
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
118th
Libya rank
117th
Legislative Corruption Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports -0.866 against -0.903 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.037.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Libya ranks 117th of 174 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4692 | -1.08 | 1.55 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | -0.468 | -1.08 | 0.617 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | -0.5911 | -0.8242 | 0.2331 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | -0.8835 | -0.8887 | 0.0052 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher legislative corruption score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Libya?
- Libya, at -0.866 against -0.903 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in legislative corruption score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Libya?
- 0.037, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Libya?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Libya rank globally for legislative corruption score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Libya ranks 117th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Legislative Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which members of the legislature abuse their position for financial gain, such as bribes, government contracts, future employment, or stealing from the state. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.