Oman vs Qatar: Key media freedoms

Oman
-1.02
in 2025
Qatar
-1.11
in 2025
Oman rank
139th
Qatar rank
140th

Key media freedoms over time

  • Oman
  • Qatar
-2.5-2-1.5-1190019622025

How they compare

Oman currently reports -1.02 against -1.11 in Qatar, a difference of 0.09.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Qatar ahead.

Oman ranks 139th and Qatar ranks 140th of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 12.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Qatar Difference Ahead
1900s -2.65 -2.18 0.463 Qatar
1910s -2.58 -2.18 0.3966 Qatar
1920s -2.45 -2.18 0.2701 Qatar
1930s -2.65 -2.18 0.472 Qatar
1940s -2.65 -2.18 0.472 Qatar
1950s -2.65 -1.46 1.19 Qatar
1960s -2.65 -1.46 1.19 Qatar
1970s -2.11 -1.46 0.6484 Qatar
1980s -1.97 -1.46 0.5102 Qatar
1990s -1.95 -1.46 0.485 Qatar
2000s -1.95 -0.827 1.12 Qatar
2010s -1.36 -0.9466 0.4113 Qatar
2020s -1.02 -1.06 0.0363 Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher key media freedoms, Oman or Qatar?
Oman, at -1.02 against -1.11 in Qatar as of 2025.
What is the difference in key media freedoms between Oman and Qatar?
0.09, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Qatar?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Oman and Qatar rank globally for key media freedoms?
Oman ranks 139th and Qatar ranks 140th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Key media freedoms. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Key media freedoms
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 21,793 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the government directly or indirectly attempts to censor political content in print and broadcast media, through formal restrictions or indirect pressures such as financial control, licensing, or access to distribution channels.