Mexico vs Zimbabwe: Key media freedoms

Mexico
-0.582
in 2025
Zimbabwe
-0.654
in 2025
Mexico rank
129th
Zimbabwe rank
130th

Key media freedoms over time

  • Mexico
  • Zimbabwe
-3-2-101190019622025

How they compare

Mexico currently reports -0.582 against -0.654 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.072.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mexico ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 130th of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1900s -2.73 0.391 3.12 Zimbabwe
1910s -1.08 0.391 1.47 Zimbabwe
1920s -1.31 0.391 1.7 Zimbabwe
1930s -1.22 0.391 1.61 Zimbabwe
1940s -1.25 0.195 1.45 Zimbabwe
1950s -1.48 -0.0262 1.45 Zimbabwe
1960s -1.53 -0.6941 0.8319 Zimbabwe
1970s 0 -1.34 1.34 Mexico
1980s 0 0.2228 0.2228 Zimbabwe
1990s 0.257 -0.4985 0.7555 Mexico
2000s 0.6744 -1.08 1.75 Mexico
2010s 0.7341 -0.5123 1.25 Mexico
2020s -0.2427 -0.532 0.2893 Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher key media freedoms, Mexico or Zimbabwe?
Mexico, at -0.582 against -0.654 in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in key media freedoms between Mexico and Zimbabwe?
0.072, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Zimbabwe?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Mexico and Zimbabwe rank globally for key media freedoms?
Mexico ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 130th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Key media freedoms. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Key media freedoms
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 21,793 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the government directly or indirectly attempts to censor political content in print and broadcast media, through formal restrictions or indirect pressures such as financial control, licensing, or access to distribution channels.