Maldives vs Spain: Key media freedoms

Maldives
1.21
in 2025
Spain
1.17
in 2025
Maldives rank
58th
Spain rank
60th

Key media freedoms over time

  • Maldives
  • Spain
-202190019622025

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 1.21 against 1.17 in Spain, a difference of 0.04.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Spain ahead.

Maldives ranks 58th and Spain ranks 60th of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 5 and Spain in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Spain Difference Ahead
1900s -0.264 0.005 0.269 Spain
1910s -0.264 0.005 0.269 Spain
1920s -0.264 -1.82 1.56 Maldives
1930s -0.354 0.2353 0.5893 Spain
1940s -0.414 -2.34 1.93 Maldives
1950s -0.414 -2.34 1.93 Maldives
1960s -0.414 -2.25 1.84 Maldives
1970s -0.6868 -1.23 0.5406 Maldives
1980s -1.78 2.05 3.83 Spain
1990s -1.7 2.05 3.75 Spain
2000s -0.6872 2.05 2.74 Spain
2010s 0.2004 2.07 1.87 Spain
2020s 1.09 1.74 0.6482 Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher key media freedoms, Maldives or Spain?
Maldives, at 1.21 against 1.17 in Spain as of 2025.
What is the difference in key media freedoms between Maldives and Spain?
0.04, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Spain?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Maldives and Spain rank globally for key media freedoms?
Maldives ranks 58th and Spain ranks 60th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Key media freedoms. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Key media freedoms
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 21,793 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the government directly or indirectly attempts to censor political content in print and broadcast media, through formal restrictions or indirect pressures such as financial control, licensing, or access to distribution channels.